Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tulang Bawang Berkenaan Dengan Perkara Syarat Saksi dalam Talak (Studi Putusan No. 0138/Pdt.G/2014/Pa.Tlb) Serta Korelasinya Dengan Mazhab Syafi'i
Authors
Ari Nuansah
Akhmad Huseini
This research discusses the analysis of the decision of the Tulang Bawang Religious Court in the case of talak witness requirements (study of decision No. 0138/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Tlb) and its correlation with the Syafi'i Madzhab. This research is considered important because people assume that divorce is considered valid if it has been decided by a judge. Meanwhile, according to the Syafi'i Madzhab, divorce is declared valid after the husband says the word divorce/talak. This research aims to provide awareness to the public regarding the legal provisions of fiqh which state that talak is legally punished because of the husband's verbal words and does not have to be decided in court. This research discusses three main problems, namely 1). What is the analysis of the decision of the Tulang Bawang Religious Court in the case of talak witness requirements (study of decision No. 0138/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Tlb)? 2) The decision regarding the requirements for talak witnesses in KHI law?, 3) How is the correlation between the Syafi'i Madzhab relating to talak witnesses with the decision of the Tulang Bawang Religious Court? The type of research used is a literature review, where the sources for this type of research come from documents that are relevant to the research to be studied. The results of the research show that the marriage regulations in force in Indonesia stipulate that every divorce, whether talak divorce or contested divorce, must be carried out in court along with witnesses as stated in Article 22 paragraph (2) PP No. 9/1975 and Article 134 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The obligation to present witnesses according to applicable positive law is mandatory. This is different from what is stated in the Shafi'i school of thought which states that the presence of witnesses in a talak is not an obligation and is not a condition for the validity of the talak.
A., Azhari, A. F., Basri, M. M., & Muin, F. (2016). TRANSFORMATION OF MAQÂSHID Al-SYARÎ’AH (An Overview of the Development of Islamic Law in Indonesia). AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v11i1.854.
Abdul Aziz Muhammad Azzam, A. W. S. H. (2009). Fiqh Munakahat. Jakarta : Amzah.
Adzimah, N. (2015). Nur Adzimah, “Kedudukan Saksi Perempuan Dalam Kasus Perceraian Analisis Perbandingan pendapat empat Imam Mazhab Dengan Hukum Positif Yang Berlaku di Indonesia.”
Ahmad Amrullah. (1996). Dimensi Hukum Islam dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jakarta : Gema Insani pres.
Al-Syafi’i, Al-Imam Abi ‘Abd Allah Muhammad ibn Idris ibn ‘Abbās,. (2002). Al-Umm, juz III. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Amiruddin, A. H. S., Syarifuddin Hasyim. (t.t.). “Keberadaan Alat Bukti Saksi Dalam Perkara Perceraian: Studi Penelitian pada Mahkamah Syar’iyah Jantho.” 2014, 7.
Anshoruddin. (2004). Hukum Pembuktian Menurut Hukum Acara Islam dan Hukum Positif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Arippuddin, A. (2017). Penerapan Asas Mempersulit Terjadinya Perceraian, Studi Kasus di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Kota Banda Aceh.
Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. HUMANIKA, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075
Fikri, F. (2015). Fikri, Pemikiran Rahasia Hukum Islam dalam Ruang Publik (Huquq Allah), Diktum, Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, Vol.13 No.1,2015, h. 13-14.
Fikri, F., Bahri, A., & Budiman, B. (2018). Islamic Inheritance Legislation Toward The National Law: The Analysis Of Justice Values In Bacukiki Parepare Society. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 17(01), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v17i01.21.
Herawati Andi. (2011). Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) Sebagai Hasil Ijtihad Ulama Indonesia. Studia Islamika.
Kompilasi Hukum Islam. (t.t.). Media Centre, tt.
Kompilasi Hukum Islam. (129M).
Kompilasi Hukum Islam, (Media Centre, tt.), h. 115. (t.t.).
Leny Maria, U. (t.t.). Analisis Maslahah Terhadap Pendapat Madzhab Syiah Imamiyah Mengenai Kedudukan Saksi Dalam Ikrar Talak. 2018.
Mohd., W. (17M). Masalah Hukum Islam Perspektif Sosiologi Antropologi Hukum. Vol. 1, No.
Muhammad bin Idris al-Syafi’i. (1993). Al-Umm, Juz 7. Beirut: Dar al-Kutb al-‘Ilmiyyah.2
Muhammad Muhyi Ad-Din Abdul Hamid. (2018). Sunan Abi Daud: Vol. jilid III, h.180. Maktabah Abi Al- Ma’athy.
Muhammad, R. (2018). EksekusiPutusanPengadilanAgamaTerkaitNafkahIddah,Mut’ah. Vol 1 No. 2.
Muhammad Siddiq, A. (2018). Implementing Islamic Constitutionalism: How Islamic Is Indonesia Constitution, Al-’Adalah. 15, No 2.
Nasution, B. J. (2018). Eksistensi Lembaga Peradilan Dalam Negara Hukum Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 15(02), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v15i02.361.
Novita Dyah, K. S. Y. (2016). “Kekuatan Pembuktian Persangkaan Sebagai Alat Bukti yang Sah pada Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama, Studi Putusan Nomor 216/Pdt.G/2015/Pa.Sgt”,. Hukum Acara Universitas Sebelas Maret, no. 3.
Nurlaili, R. (2018). Keuntungan Mediasi dalam Perkara Mediasi dalam perkara perceraian dengan adanya Perma No.1 tahun 2016, Ahkam. 6, No.1.
Prastowo, A., P., A. (2016). Memahami Metode-metode Penelitian: Suatu Tinjauan Teoretis dan Praksis. Ar-Ruzz Media.
Safira, M. E. (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata. Ponorogo : CV. Senyum Indonesia.
Sainul, A. (2018). KONSEP PERJANJIAN PERKAWINAN DI INDONESIA. Jurnal el-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial, 4(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qonuniy.v4i1.1827.
Syihabuddin Mahmud bin ‘Abdillah alhusaini al-Alusi, M. B. (2016). Ruh al-Ma’ani Fi Yafsi alQur’an al-‘Adzim wa al-Sab’i al-Masani. Lihat Mohammad Barmawi, “Ikrar Talak Pengadilan Agama. Qolamuna.
Undang-undang Peradilan Agama. (t.t.). Media Centre, tt.
Undang-undang Perkawinan. (2010). Surabaya : Kesindo Utama.
Wahbah Zuhaili. (2012). al-Fiqh al-Syāfi’ī al-Muyassar, ed. In, Fiqih Imam Syafi’i. Jakarta : al-Mahira.
Zainal, A. (2018). Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia, cet.III, (Jakarta: Prenamedia Group. Hlm.131.
Zaman, M. (2018). Analisis Istihsan Atas Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Saksi Non Muslim Pada Perkara Perceraian. AL-HUKAMA’, 8(2), 507–531. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2018.8.2.507-531.
Article Sidebar
Copyright (c) 2025 Ari Nuansah, Akhmad Huseini

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.