All submitted manuscripts to Jurnal Al-Fawa’id : Jurnal Agama dan Bahasa undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and relevance of the published research.

The journal applies a double-blind peer review system, in which both the reviewers and the authors remain anonymous throughout the review process.

Initial Screening

Upon submission, the manuscript is first evaluated by the editorial team to ensure that it fits the journal’s scope, adheres to the author guidelines, and meets basic academic standards.

Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be rejected without external review.

Peer Review Stage

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise in the subject area.

Reviewers are selected based on their academic qualifications, research experience, and publication record.

Review Criteria

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on the following criteria:

> originality and contribution to the field

> methodological rigor

> clarity of analysis and argumentation

> relevance to the journal’s scope

> quality of references and academic writing

Review Outcome

Based on the reviewers’ reports, the editorial decision may be:

> Accept without revision

> Minor revision

> Major revision

> Reject

 Authors are required to revise their manuscripts according to reviewers’ comments and resubmit within the specified time.

Final Decision

The final decision on manuscript acceptance is made by the Editor-in-Chief, based on the reviewers’ recommendations and the revised version of the manuscript.

Plagiarism Screening

All manuscripts are screened for plagiarism using appropriate plagiarism detection software after the review process.

Review Timeline

The review process typically takes 8–10 weeks, depending on the availability of reviewers and the extent of revisions required.